[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Interix package error



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Denis Raguzov wrote:
> Martin, you wrote at http://debian-interix.net/debian-interix/INSTALL to
> run apt-get update as the next step, so I want to run "apt-get update".
> * Now run
>   $ apt-get update
[...]
> It is fail. What is wrong ?

It hasn't failed, it's just a warning and you can safely ignore it.

What you should be seeing is:

$ apt-get update
Get:1 http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release.gpg
Ign http://debian-interix.net unreleased35 Release.gpg
Get:2 http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release [320B]
Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable Release.gpg [197B]
[...lots more lines like this...]
Fetched 9380kB in 40s (234kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://debian-interix.net unstable35 Release: The
following signatures were invalid: NODATA 2
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
$

Then the apt-get update stage should succeed cleanly. This will look like:

$ apt-get upgrade -f -V
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
   [...list of packages...]
3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 335kB of archives.
After unpacking 56.3kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

If you say Y you will then get:

WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  [...list of packages...]
Install these packages without verification [y/N]?

All the warning is doing is saying that it's unable to check the
signatures to verify that the packages are genuine. Assuming you trust
Martin Koeppe, you can now say y to proceed.

- --
David Given
dg@cowlark.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknbpDAACgkQf9E0noFvlziSEACgtemMGoRYBTnV5AaaauhyvmIF
HXIAn1VLhjVK5U4vdDDg6uXFJdVInJ5r
=1/1W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: