Unable to ping6 on local network im vmware
Hello,
I've started to use IPv6 on Debian Lenny. To do so I set up an HE-/64 Tunnel an registered an a routed /48 block
tunnel is: 2001:470:1f14:1460::/64
Routed block is: 2001:470:d600::/48
The tunnel is running fine - and I can Ping ipv6 hosts outside.
he-ipv6 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
inet6 addr: fe80::ac10:f801/64 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: 2001:470:1f14:1460::2/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::ac12:1/64 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fe80::576a:da85/64 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fe80::ac10:1/64 Scope:Link
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1280 Metric:1
RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:458 (458.0 B) TX bytes:618 (618.0 B)
Furthermore I assigned a /64slice of 2001:470:d600::/48 to dummy0
dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr e6:70:b6:3e:23:e7
inet addr:172.18.0.1 Bcast:172.18.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: 2001:470:d600::1/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::e470:b6ff:fe3e:23e7/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:126 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:14232 (13.8 KiB)
and set up raddvd to announc auto-configuration
interface dummy0
{
AdvSendAdvert on;
prefix 2001:470:d600::1/64
{
};
};
routing seems to be running fine and I can reach 2001:470:d600::1 from the outside
ip -6 route
2001:470:1f14:1460::1 dev he-ipv6 metric 1024 mtu 1280 advmss 1220 hoplimit 4294967295
2001:470:1f14:1460::/64 via :: dev he-ipv6 metric 256 mtu 1280 advmss 1220 hoplimit 4294967295
2001:470:d600::/64 dev dummy0 metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev vmnet1 metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev vmnet8 metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev eth0 metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev dummy0 metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 via :: dev he-ipv6 metric 256 mtu 1280 advmss 1220 hoplimit 4294967295
default via 2001:470:1f14:1460::1 dev he-ipv6 metric 1024 mtu 1280 advmss 1220 hoplimit 4294967295
ping from miredo / toredo client:
ping6 2001:470:d600::1
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001::5ef5:79fd:1c04:3ba8:a8b0:4d4c --> 2001:470:d600::1
16 bytes from 2001:470:d600::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=61 time=125.626 ms
16 bytes from 2001:470:d600::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=61 time=27.079 ms
16 bytes from 2001:470:d600::1, icmp_seq=2 hlim=61 time=27.759 ms
dummy0 is assigned to a vmware-bridge, that is connected to a debian lenny guest.
The guest got its radvd announce and set up his interfacse:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:BB:D7:70
inet addr:172.18.0.2 Bcast:172.18.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: 2001:470:d600:0:20c:29ff:febb:d770/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:febb:d770/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:34 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:55 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:6820 (6.6 KiB) TX bytes:4602 (4.4 KiB)
ip -6 route
2001:470:d600::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 2147074sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev eth1 metric 256 expires 21325411sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev eth0 metric 256 expires 21325466sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
default via fe80::e470:b6ff:fe3e:23e7 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 1717sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64
The interface itself is running fine, the guest is able to ping 172.18.0.1 (IPv4 address of host), but he's not able to ping6 2001:470:d600::1.
Even more, the guest seems to be unaware of his neighbor:
ping6 2001:470:d600::1
PING 2001:470:d600::1(2001:470:d600::1) 56 data bytes
From 2001:470:d600:0:20c:29ff:febb:d770 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
ip -6 neig
fe80::e470:b6ff:fe3e:23e7 dev eth1 lladdr e6:70:b6:3e:23:e7 router STALE
2001:470:d600::1 dev eth1 FAILED
What might be wrong here?
Thanks in advance,
J.Luehr
Reply to: