[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: redundant mail servers



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

It is too complex.
I do the following: I have a friend who knows (a little) the topology of our 
network.
I write root and users passwords on the paper, put it into the safe, and ask 
my boss to call him, if something goes wrong...

;)

>
> I want to setup a redundant mail system using exim with maildirs.
> I thought I use two mail servers (one scsi controller each)
> and one scsi raid.
>
> 1.    Server1 ---SCSI--- RAID5 ---SCSI--- Server2
>
> or to remove the RAID as a Single Point of Failure: 2 RAIDs and 4 SCSI
> controllers:
>
>               /---SCSI--- RAID5 1 ---SCSI---\
> 2.    Server1                                 Server2
>               \---SCSI--- RAID5 2 ---SCSI---/
>
>
> In both cases mail is delivered to the users homes into maildirs,
> which will reside on the RAID.
> Is it possible (case 1) to mount one ext2 partition on two computers at
> the same time?
> Is it possible (case 2) to run a software raid1 over two partitions (one
> on each raid5) from both computers at the same time?
>
> Please let me know, if I'm heading in the wrong direction. The setup
> will be for a team with 20 persons, so there won't be too much mail
> traffic. The only problem is, I won't be reachable for 2 months, and
> therefore the system should run without the need of a sysadmin.
> Well, there is another one - I've only 15 days left to set it up.
>
> I also thought about using just 2 computers one harddrive each.
> The homes on server one are mounted as /home-remote on server 2 via nfs
> and vice versa. Both MTAs should deliver each mail twice (into /home and
> /home-remote and the pop3/imap servers serve the mails from /home).
> If one computer goes down, the other one would have all the mails.
> However I think, this becomes really nasty, when using .forward files.
>
> Any help would make me very happy.
>
> tia
> florian

- -- 

Andrei.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8VumfNJ8kL/cM9QkRAtBeAJ96TlblAIRzClcG5AreqYOjeG2mqQCgtRPg
LHQoIxtJoktN8PdHSr69Cow=
=OQZI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: