Re: [Fwd: Re: Spamassasin over RBL, was Re: rblsmtpd -t?]
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
[SNIP]
> no, it's not relative. there is an absolute, black-and-white criteria
> which you are too stupid to see: if a site is part of the spam problem
> then it should be black-listed. if it is not part of the problem then
> it shouldn't be listed.
Pray tell then, *when* is a site part of the spam problem?
Please share your infallible, absolute, black-and-white criteria for
that, because obviously we were missing it all along.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | e-advies@evbergen.xs4all.nl
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: