Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 at 11:08:35 -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
>
> We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it
> generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just
> continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the message
> bounces. We're using amavisd-postfix.
>
> I know there are also other variants of amavis such as amavis-ng that we could
> try. Has anyone compared amavis to mailscanner and come to a definite
> conclusion as to one being better. I know better is very subjective but I'd
> still like to hear opinions.
>
> I'd like to eventually hook spam trapping into the filter (I think amavis-ng
> does that) as well.
I have never used Mailscanner so I can't compare them.
I use Postfix with Amavisd-new (note "d-new") and I'm very glad.
As a plus, it cooperates with antivirus scanners and with Spamassassin.
--
Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only
tomek@lodz.tpsa.pl http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/ | ones and zeros.
tomek@clamav.net http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner
Reply to: