--- Begin Message ---
- To: Leimy <dleimbac@falcon.lhup.edu>
- Cc: Christian Lynbech <chl@tbit.dk>, help-hurd@gnu.org
- Subject: Re: Microkernel advocacy
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 15:41:02 +0200
- Message-id: <19991029154102.B1066@magma.alg.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.A32.3.96.991029065924.16534A-100000@falcon.lhup.edu>; from dleimbac@falcon.lhup.edu on Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 07:00:17AM -0400
- References: <ofhfja4piq.fsf@chl.tbit.dk> <Pine.A32.3.96.991029065924.16534A-100000@falcon.lhup.edu>
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 07:00:17AM -0400, Leimy wrote:
> Does all of this mean that JAVA could run closer to the kernel (at least
> relative to other languages in different operating systems) in a
> microkernel OS than Linux or Windows?
Of course, just add java magic to the exec server, and java programs
are run as transparent as hash bang scripts or elf files.
It will (is?) possible to have different exec servers for different users.
Marcus
--
"The purpose of Free Software is Free Software.
The End and the Means are the same." -- Craig Sanders
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
--- End Message ---