Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> I tend to agree that the name java2-virtual-machine is a little
> misleading and perhaps silly (a remnant from when "virtual machine"
> was a hot buzzword). Perhaps something like java2-runtime?
java2-runtime is fine with me. My only concern is that it differs from
the pre set standard java-virtual-machine.
If we go ahead with java2-runtime I would advocate obsoleting
java-virtual-machine in favour of java(1?)-runtime for java1 packages.
I think it's important to keep things consistent.
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: Open Software Associates GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&' Email : Marcus.Crafter@osa.de
&&&&. Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
&&&&&&&:
Reply to: