[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?



On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> 
> > Ok this shounds good, but some things before I'll add it to the
> > policy.
> > 
> > * Should we have a java2-compiler too?
> 
> 	This probably should be discussed. It would be nice for Build-depends:
> 	lines in debian/control files.
> 
> > * The java-virtual-machine should only be provided by the java2 virtual
> >   machine if it is (completely?) backwards compatible.
> 
> 	Agreed (BTW - I'd be interested to know wich java2 environments
> 	aren't java1 backwards compatible).

Me too.

> > * Should we have a java1-virtual-machine?
> 
> 	Would this be instead of having java-virtual-machine, or in addition
> 	to it ?

In adition, but my last posting about java-virtual-machine, java1-runtime
and java2-runtime is probably better.

Regards,

// Ola

> 	Cheers,
> 
> 	Marcus
> -- 
>         .....
>      ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
>     ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
>     $:         $$$$:   Open Software Associates GmbH
>      $       o_)$$$:   82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
>      ;$,    _/\ &&:'   60327 Frankfurt Germany
>        '     /( &&&
>            \_&&&&'     Email : Marcus.Crafter@osa.de
>           &&&&.        Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
>     &&&&&&&:
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: