On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au> wrote: > One thing stands out for me - the package numbering, e.g. > libphonenumber5, libphonenumber6, ... I'm not the right person to discuss libphonenumber versioning with, so I've forwarded that question to the libphonenumber-discuss mailing list now: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/libphonenumber-discuss/l0lsE43Y_bU/discussion -- Fredrik Roubert roubert@google.com