[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 25, 2003



On 31/08/2003 at 20:36 Ben Armstrong wrote...

> Which of the three packages?

Maybe all, i'm getting the sources and taking a look on them, upon
on that i'll see, but they doesn't seem hard to mantain.

> 
> If you're serious about adopting them, and you haven't yet applied for
> maintainership, I recommend you look over the materials at nm.debian.org and
> start your application.
> 

Yes, i'm serious. I've did but since i hadn't advocate it just expired, 
anyway i'm working on that with a developer and having real packages to work
on would be great to support my application and also contribute to this
subproject.
Yes i've read the documentation before.

-Rudy

-- 

  +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
  | I don't believe in viruses, i run Debian         http://debian.org |
  +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
  | http://www.apesol.org.pe         -*-         http://stone-head.org |
  | GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB  35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21         |
  +--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: pgp_nmBbvQSQD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: