Hi! Ok nice, if nobody has an affective relation with the work previously achieved, that's easier for us to work on it as you noticed! I still need to read particular points of the blends but I think at first glance it's quite limpid. The only thing that seemed strange to me is to see long package descriptions in package lists, like the end of the arcade file: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/blends/projects/junior/trunk/debian-junior/tasks/arcade?view=markup Is there an official syntax definition of these files? Cheers, JM. > In the same manner as Ben I will not try to put any of my ideas on you > which only could lead to some demotivation on your side. Just try to > implement your vision. The only thing I would really like to make sure > is that you are sure you understood the Blends techniques in their > current state (as described here[1].) I consider the way we are > handling sets of packages as a reasonable thing (which for sure deserves > enhancements - ideas welcome.) So please make sure you understand the > technique behind and feel free to ask if something remains unclear.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part