[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#520891: marked as done (general: Data coruption on my /dev/sda - /dev/sdd sata_siil siil 3114 chip)

Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:59:44 +0200
with message-id <20090909185944.GC22023@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: general: Data coruption on my /dev/sda - /dev/sdd sata_siil siil 3114 chip
has caused the Debian Bug report #520891,
regarding general: Data coruption on my /dev/sda - /dev/sdd sata_siil siil 3114 chip
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
520891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: general
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Files on theese /dev/sda-/dev/sdd drivers are going courrupt :(
They are all samsung spinpoint 500GB  

I have before tryed to run soft RAID5 on them, not good :-(

Bengt /

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.6.28-1

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:36:29PM +0200, wylda@volny.cz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> based on my deep testing during chasing other kernel bug (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13933),
> i can tell, that i had no such problem at all with sata_sil. Tested
> several days + checksuming.
> 
> I had no sata_sil problem with following kernels:
> 
> * 2.6.26.8
> * 2.6.27.29
> * 2.6.28.10
> * 2.6.29.6
> * 2.6.30.4
> * 2.6.30.5
> * 2.6.31-rc6

Thanks for the feedback, marking as closed, then.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: