On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 13:01 -0700, maximilian attems wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > No, I want that history and a break in history will just make my life > > harder. If you only want some of the branches you can get those. > > Ok, so let's go for history. > > > > > Known bugs: > > [...] > > > On the other hand, none of the known bugs you mention is a show-stopper > > > for the transition from my side. > > > > Yes but they would be harder to fix later. (git filter-branch is > > powerful but it invalidates everyone else's clones.) > > can you fix some of them in svn (preimport)? or does it need git-filter > changes? > Either git-filter-branch or changes to the svn2git rules. I have most of these fixed now and am adding some more sanity checks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part