[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#851680: marked as done (Please provide linux-image-amd64-unsigned et al. metapackages (was Re: Please upload signed kernel images at the same time as unsigned ones))

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:19:39 +0000
with message-id <1484673579.2998.50.camel@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#851680: Please provide linux-image-amd64-unsigned et al. metapackages (was Re: Please upload signed kernel images at the same time as unsigned ones)
has caused the Debian Bug report #851680,
regarding Please provide linux-image-amd64-unsigned et al. metapackages (was Re: Please upload signed kernel images at the same time as unsigned ones)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
851680: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851680
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 4.9+78
Severity: wishlist

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On 01/17/2017 02:16 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:

> > Signed linux kernel images tend to become the default as package
> > linux-latest is updated when linux-signed is updated.

> > So could you please publish both signed and unsigned kernels at the same
> > time ? (As of now 4.8.15)

> That would be hard, seeing how that would mean signing content before
> that content even exists.

There seem to be no metapackages linux-latest-unsigned though,
which would eliminate this problem (for the 90%+ of us who don’t
need the signed images).

Can those please be provided?

Thanks,
//mirabilos
-- 
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 14:51 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: linux-image-amd64
> Version: 4.9+78
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> > On 01/17/2017 02:16 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:
> > > Signed linux kernel images tend to become the default as package
> > > linux-latest is updated when linux-signed is updated.
> > > So could you please publish both signed and unsigned kernels at
> > > the same
> > > time ? (As of now 4.8.15)
> > That would be hard, seeing how that would mean signing content
> > before
> > that content even exists.
> 
> There seem to be no metapackages linux-latest-unsigned though,
> which would eliminate this problem (for the 90%+ of us who don’t
> need the signed images).
> 
> Can those please be provided?

No, there will be no such meta-packages.  The -unsigned packages are
only meant for developer testing and as build dependencies for signed
binary packages.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert
Camus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: