On Thursday, 6 October 2022 16:23:27 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > That doesn't change my perspective that the fundamental aspect of /boot > being too small should be addressed (directly) and not try to workaround > it. With workarounds I was thinking of using a better compression scheme (already done by switching to zstd) and such things to 'shave off' a 'few' bytes. On Thursday, 6 October 2022 15:41:52 CEST Ben Hutchings wrote: > The kernel team has had some discussion about changing linux-image > packages to not install vmlinuz directly in /boot: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2021/11/msg00091.html I should've read those msgs (again) before replying, but the above linked alternative is not a workaround AFAIC (which ~ makes /boot/ irrelevant IIUC).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.