On 21.03.24 07:58, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 09:59:31PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:Independent of any technical issues, this is a hijacking of a package name. Please revert that change.Okay. Please prepare to take over linux-libc-dev alltogether then, there can be only one copy.
please drop the provides:linux-libc-dev-alpha-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-amd64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-arm64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-armel-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-armhf-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-hppa-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-i386-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-loong64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-m68k-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-mips-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-mips64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-mips64el-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-mips64r6el-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-mipsel-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-powerpc-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-ppc64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-ppc64el-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-riscv64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-s390x-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-sh4-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-sparc64-cross (= 6.7.9-2), linux-libc-dev-x32-cross (= 6.7.9-2)