On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:53:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Justin B Rye (jbr@edlug.org.uk):
>
> > > Using dash as the system shell will improve the system's overall
> > > performance. It does not affect any user's choice of interactive shell.
> >
> > Agreed; I couldn't come up with anything better. You might add
>
>
> The only glitch I see is that, in the case of multi-user machines, or
> machines administered centrally, the interactive shell is not
> necessarily the user's choice.
>
> But I can't come with something better that Jonathan's proposal
> anyway..
Well, it's slightly less elegant, but you could say:
It does not alter the shell presented to interactive users.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature