Re: Suspend to disk?

To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Suspend to disk?
From: Paolo <oopla@users.sf.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:54:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070825145430.GD16760@localhost>
Mail-followup-to: oopla@murphy.debian.org, debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ecfa260c0708250208p742f03dbh460d3146abe3bc8c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20070824220535.GE9917@mail.networksplus.net> <[🔎] 20070825090240.GA1631@dementia.proulx.com> <[🔎] ecfa260c0708250208p742f03dbh460d3146abe3bc8c@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 05:08:45AM -0400, Zach wrote:
> 2.6.18 is considered ancient? LOL~
> 
well ... I reported a bug for 2.6.19.7 on bugs.kernel.org, it was deemd
'prehistoric' - go figure ...

> Maybe if he said 2.2.x :-)

eh? what's 2.2.x ? ;)

--
paolo

Reply to:

References:
- Suspend to disk?
  - From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
- Re: Suspend to disk?
  - From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx)
- Re: Suspend to disk?
  - From: Zach <netrek@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Suspend to disk?
Next by Date: Re: Suspend to disk?
Previous by thread: Re: Distributing packages in small home LAN: Proxy server vs. Cache sharing
Next by thread: Re: Suspend to disk?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread