Re: Corel's apt frontend
- To: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Cc: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Corel's apt frontend
- From: Brian Ristuccia <brianr@osiris.978.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 01:11:12 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19991101011111.K3255@osiris.978.org>
- In-reply-to: <19991031203609.F32256@debian.org>; from knghtbrd@debian.org on Sun, Oct 31, 1999 at 08:36:09PM -0800
- References: <19991031185331.464E01FF001@perens.com> <19991031120822.A30961@debian.org> <19991031174505.C22420@usatoday.com> <19991031173044.C32256@debian.org> <19991031215533.B23240@usatoday.com> <19991031203609.F32256@debian.org>
On Sun, Oct 31, 1999 at 08:36:09PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> *anxiously awaiting Brian's URL to the Nintendo v. Galoob thing which will
> hopefully settle this..*
>
Here's a page that explains Galoob V. Nintendo and similar cases. It doesn't
look like it's the same page that I read and based my summary on - but it
should be helpful, especially section C, entitled "Works that Interact With
Pre-Existing Works"
--
Brian Ristuccia
brianr@osiris.978.org
bristucc@nortelnetworks.com
bristucc@cs.uml.edu
Reply to: