Re: GNU License and Computer Break Ins
Paul Serice wrote:
> What is legally binding is neither the text I quoted nor the text to
> which you refer. Rather, it is the interpretation of the text to which
> you refer (and possibly other documents) by a judge of competent
> jurisdiction (or a similar decision maker).
>
> To my knowledge, there has been no such interpretation. So, I turn to
> the next best thing: an interpretation in the text that accompanies the
> license. I don't think this makes me silly.
It's pretty damn silly to turn to the manual for GDB for an
interpretation of the GPL.
The text you quoted is _not_ part of the GPL, nor is it commonly
distributed with the GPL. It just happens to accompny the GPL in the
GDB manual.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: