On Thu, 2022-08-04 at 19:15 -0400, Ben Westover wrote: > Interesting, the APSL 2.0 is seen in some relatively important > packages like Chromium and QtWebEngine. I wouldn't put any weight on the presence of the APSL 2.0 license text in the archive, probably it got into Debian in those packages due to lack of copyright/license review rather than deliberate acceptance, especially since it is in one of the many code copies in both of them. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part