[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant?



On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 10:31 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> 
> That's not a restriction, though. It's *not* saying "you may not use
> this software for XXX", it's saying "this software is not intended
> for XXX". There's quite a difference there IMHO.

To me it sounds like a more explicit “No Warranty” clause for critical
applications.

Regards


Reply to: