|
Good day, debian-legal! Back on February 14th, an email went to the standard NGINX mailing list that NGINX (F5) open source development changed a lot of policies and interfered with security policy use cases enough to irritate one of the main community
developers of NGINX. At that time, a fork was created of the NGINX project called “freenginx”. The list announcement of this can be seen at [1]. I was approached separately by Maxim as a known package maintainer for NGINX to see if I can help get freenginx into Debian and Ubuntu. However, as a person in business myself as a consultant, and someone who had to ask Canonical to get
involved on an unrelated trademark violation issue, I’m concerned that there may be a trademark violation problem at play. While theoretically there wouldn’t be one and we can simply add Provides: nginx to both freenginx and nginx packaging and conflicts/breaks on freenginx vs. standard nginx because the two won’t behave right with each other, the concern I
have is that we’re introducing a trademark problem into the mix. So, before I follow through with Debian packaging (which would be synced to Ubuntu downstream), may I get the opinion of debian-legal on whether there’s any copyright or trademark violation concerns that exist before I pursue getting this
into Debian? Thomas Ward [1]:
https://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2024-February/GPXQY27UA5SJJZ2Y6JWTRWJB2TKPTJR7.html |