Bug#324673: marked as done (lintian: should depend on dpkg-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:47:08 -0700
with message-id <E1E9U3Y-0004bg-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#324673: fixed in lintian 1.23.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 12:13:37 +0000
>From anibal@nukak.apana.org.au Tue Aug 23 05:13:37 2005
Return-path: <anibal@nukak.apana.org.au>
Received: from cpe-60-224-190-58.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [60.224.190.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7Xeq-0000Rp-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:13:36 -0700
Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 716CE684368; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:13:30 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:13:30 +1000
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: lintian: should depend on dpkg-dev
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050823121330.GD2656@debianrules.debiancolombia.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.11
Severity: important
lintian -i /home/pbuilder/result/tmsnc/tmsnc_0.2.4-1_sparc.changes
internal error: dpkg-source didn't report unpack directory
internal error: could not unpack package to desired level: No such file or directory
N: Skipping check of source package tmsnc
Problem fixed after installing dpkg-dev.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- http://v7w.com/anibal
--ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCxLpgY5NIXPNpFURAqqcAKCSGYDrgmZrO55qPqADJajwVKfyAACdEwir
r8eDDPVlW/1GKdj5WaquHzY=
=fEnb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ieNMXl1Fr3cevapt--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324673-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2005 20:49:03 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Sun Aug 28 13:49:03 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E9U3Y-0004bg-00; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:47:08 -0700
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 324673-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324673: fixed in lintian 1.23.12
Message-Id: <E1E9U3Y-0004bg-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:47:08 -0700
Delivered-To: 324673-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 1.23.12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
lintian_1.23.12.dsc
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.12.dsc
lintian_1.23.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.12.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.12_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.12_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 324673@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> (supplier of updated lintian package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:05:54 +0200
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.23.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
Description:
lintian - Debian package checker
Closes: 320382 321206 321564 321650 322241 322291 323098 324121 324255 324673 325225
Changes:
lintian (1.23.12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* The "bad, bad SONAME check" release
.
* all files:
+ [FL] Update FSF address
.
* debian/control:
+ [FL] Depend on dpkg-dev since we use dpkg-source. How old exactly is
this bug? (Closes: #324673)
.
* checks/binaries:
+ [FL] Only use sonames from files in common library directories for
the soname checks. This avoids many false positives. Patch by
Russ Allbery (Closes: #321564)
+ [FL] Convert the SONAME to lower case before comparing with
package name. Suggested by Josh Triplett (Closes: #321206, #325225)
+ [FL] Try to remove strings added for transition purposes from
library package names before comparing package name with SONAME.
Pointed out by Rene Engelhard (Closes: #322241, #324121)
+ [FL] Also remove -udeb strings and substitute lib64 with lib in
package name before comparing with SONAME
+ [FL] Replace any occurence of _ in the SONAME with - since the
former isn't allowed in package names but occasionally used in
sonames
+ [FL] Remove trailing .so from SONAMEs
+ [FL] Also ignore static binaries in sub directories of /boot,
not only in /boot itself. Patch by Guillem Jover
(Closes: #320382)
* checks/changelog-file:
+ [FL] Detect old FSF address additionally to the even older
one
* checks/{cruft,files}{,.desc}:
+ [FL] Also check for .arch-ids/ {arch}/ .arch-inventory and .bzr/
in packages and sources (Closes: #324255)
* checks/debhelper{,.desc}:
+ [FL] Warn about using debhelper compat version lower than 3
like debhelper itself
+ [FL] Drop package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper
tag for compat versions < 5. With debhelper 4 even in oldstable
issuing an error here is silly
+ [FL] Fix typo (s,debian/control,debian/compat,) in description of
declares-possibly-conflicting-debhelper-compat-versions
* checks/description{,.desc}:
+ [FL] Avoid double warning about description-is-dh_make-template
in the same way we do it for the corresponding debmake tag
+ [FL] Policy section of Description field has changed
* checks/fields{,.desc}:
+ [FL] Fix a lot of off-by-one errors in the policy references
(caused by the addition of the Uploaders field). Unknowningly
pointed out by Russ Allbery
+ [FL] Also use non_standards_archs when checking source package
relations. Patch by Russ Allbery (Closes: #322291)
* checks/manpages:
+ [FL] Don't issue warnings about 8bit characters in translated
man pages. Patch by Denis Barbier (Closes: #321650)
* checks/scripts:
+ [FL] Don't issue bashism warning on POSIX character classes ([[:foo:]]).
Noted by Stephen Gran (Closes: #323098)
+ [FL] Remove some useless groupings in the bashism regexes
Files:
326c28428894475e63c9cb7955735ff6 772 devel optional lintian_1.23.12.dsc
59449ee2d6212df94668ebc6e2ac7b49 265933 devel optional lintian_1.23.12.tar.gz
3dfc575fd98907065e572bbfdec942d6 230748 devel optional lintian_1.23.12_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDEh6gQbn06FtxPfARAnKDAJ9ZLKxuW5gKq6RUG/crX5YSU5xLcQCfbjtd
S/u24ehyDtthkSWB5PmbEKo=
=df33
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: