[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#615073: lintian.debian.org: provide (dd-)list of packages affected by a specific tag



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-02-25 15:27, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.4.3
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> It would be nice if lintian.d.o could provide, for each tag-specific page
> (e.g. http://lintian.debian.org/tags/description-contains-homepage.html), a
> plain text list of all packages affected by the tag. An extra bonus would be
> providing both a plain text list and an associated dd-list.
> 
> The intended use cases are ease other automatic processing of the information
> provided by lintian, such as input for bapase, and MBF.
> 
> Thanks for considering (and for lintian!),
> Cheers.
> 
> [...]

Hey,

For now you can pull the raw log[1] and do:

  grep $tag lintian.log | cut -f 2 -d: | sort -u

To get the name of all packages that are affected by a tag - depending
on the tag it may list binary packages (e.g.
description-contains-homepage is one of these).

~Niels

[1] (large file) http://lintian.debian.org/lintian.log
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=2pOH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: