[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.5.10-232-g8b88520



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 8b88520dfff394934c611348b79d4b04d707de0d
Author: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Date:   Tue Oct 30 15:16:43 2012 +0100

    c/java: Remove experimental marker from byte-code tag
    
    Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

diff --git a/checks/java.desc b/checks/java.desc
index dd652ba..6c12ac8 100644
--- a/checks/java.desc
+++ b/checks/java.desc
@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ Info: The jar file contains a manifest but no code. This probably indicates
 Tag: incompatible-java-bytecode-format
 Severity: normal
 Certainty: possible
-Experimental: yes
 Info: The package contains Java class files with a minimum requirement on the
  listed Java version.  This Java version is not supported by the default JVM
  in Debian and is therefore likely to be a mistake.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 38c34d1..a743a84 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ lintian (2.5.11) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
       check.
     + [NT] Use L::Collect's conffile API instead of accessing the
       "conffiles" control file directly.
+  * checks/java.desc:
+    + [NT] Remove the "experimental" marker of the Java byte-code
+      check.
   * checks/manpages{,.desc}:
     + [CW,NT] Manually do redirects and chdir rather than
       invoking a shell when calling man and lexgrog.
diff --git a/t/tests/java-class-format/tags b/t/tests/java-class-format/tags
index 545d902..4ef86bd 100644
--- a/t/tests/java-class-format/tags
+++ b/t/tests/java-class-format/tags
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
+W: libtest-java: incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java7 version (Class format: 51)
 W: libtest-java: unknown-java-class-version usr/share/java/testa-1.0.jar (org/debian/lintian/TestA.class -> 42)
-X: libtest-java: incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java7 version (Class format: 51)

-- 
Debian package checker


Reply to: