[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#661103: marked as done (binaries-have-file-conflict not marked as experimental)

Your message dated Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0200
with message-id <34fac322e2448d7b01f71e8a4053f099.squirrel@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#661103: binaries-have-file-conflict not marked as experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #661103,
regarding binaries-have-file-conflict not marked as experimental
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
661103: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661103
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.5
Severity: minor

Hi,

I got these new warnings when checking a package (false positives, btw):

W: gnupg source: binaries-have-file-conflict gnupg gnupg-curl
usr/lib/gnupg/gpgkeys_curl
W: gnupg source: binaries-have-file-conflict gnupg gnupg-curl
usr/lib/gnupg/gpgkeys_hkp

The tag description claims that these new tags are experimental, and they
are also not mentioned as 'added tags' in the changelog. I therefore think
they were mistakenly not classified as 'X' but was 'W'.


Cheers,
Thijs

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.5.7

It seems that this was fixed at some point, probably 2.5.7.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: