Bug#754730: [lintian] packages should not depend on AppArmor
Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> Lamby, could you confirm whether we only need someone to write the patch?
Thanks for your enthusiasm :)
I think it's preferable to wait until a decision is made for Buster
wrt. AppArmor though: if we decide to ship this LSM enabled by default
via kernel configuration (as is currently the case in testing/sid as
per proposed experiment), then #702030 becomes moot and in turn this
Lintian feature request becomes moot as well.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Reply to: