[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#754730: [lintian] packages should not depend on AppArmor



Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> Lamby, could you confirm whether we only need someone to write the patch?

Thanks for your enthusiasm :)

I think it's preferable to wait until a decision is made for Buster
wrt. AppArmor though: if we decide to ship this LSM enabled by default
via kernel configuration (as is currently the case in testing/sid as
per proposed experiment), then #702030 becomes moot and in turn this
Lintian feature request becomes moot as well.

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri


Reply to: