Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:42:09 +0000 with message-id <1547509329.123855.1634638904.2C082F85@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: lintian: Check for overrides that are missing an explanation has caused the Debian Bug report #735518, regarding lintian: Check for overrides that are missing an explanation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 735518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735518 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: lintian: warning for overrides that are missing an explanation
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:51:04 +0800
- Message-id: <1389844264.4857.5.camel@chianamo>
Package: lintian Severity: wishlist Please add a warning for overrides where there is no comment before them explaining the situation leading to the override. See also #512901 and #474590 for related lintian bug reports. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWiseAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 735518-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: lintian: Check for overrides that are missing an explanation
- From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:42:09 +0000
- Message-id: <1547509329.123855.1634638904.2C082F85@webmail.messagingengine.com>
- In-reply-to: <1517299138.505244.1252867744.475F5D6C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
- References: <1517299138.505244.1252867744.475F5D6C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Chris Lamb wrote: > > Check for overrides that are missing an explanation > > I think so many overrides are somewhat self-evident that this would > result in so many false-positives that this would just be too annoying. > > And that would be even if we started "from scratch" and encouraged this > from the start of Lintian - we have an archive full of mostly uncommented > overrides at this point that might be too big a ship to turn around at > this point. I'm actually going to go-ahead and close this rather than have an arbitrary set of Lintian bugs closed and another arbitrary set left-open as "wont fix". Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
--- End Message ---