[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#872009: marked as done (lintian: suggest using dh_missing --fail-missing)



Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:41:07 +0000
with message-id <1547509267.123224.1634637072.7DC18CE6@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#872009: lintian: suggest using dh_missing --fail-missing
has caused the Debian Bug report #872009,
regarding lintian: suggest using dh_missing --fail-missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872009: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872009
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.52
Severity: wishlist

With the introduction of dh_missing with debhelper 10, I'd like
lintian to suggest, e.g. via a pedantic warning, to use the fail flag:

<snip>
override_dh_missing:
    dh_missing --fail-missing
</snip>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Chris Lamb wrote:

> > > Isn't this the default in the latest Debhelper now? Compat level
> > > 10…?
> >
> > No.  I would also recommend that we reconsider doing this via lintian atm.
> 
> Thank you for your detailed and considered input Niels. :) Tagging bug
> according; sorry Christian!

I'm actually going to go-ahead and close this rather than have an
arbitrary set of Lintian bugs closed and another arbitrary set
left-open as "wont fix".


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

--- End Message ---

Reply to: