[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#920314: marked as done (lintian: vcs-field-has-unexpected-spaces has false positives for Vcs-Hg that specify a branch)

Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2019 09:41:05 +0100
with message-id <1548578465.2242109.1644469016.1E3A7938@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: lintian: vcs-field-has-unexpected-spaces has false positives for Vcs-Hg that specify a branch
has caused the Debian Bug report #920314,
regarding lintian: vcs-field-has-unexpected-spaces has false positives for Vcs-Hg that specify a branch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
920314: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920314
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: lintian
Version: 2.5.123

I think all of these are false positives except for rust-num-cpus.

https://lintian.debian.org/tags/vcs-field-has-unexpected-spaces.html

In particular, -b or --branch should be allowed for Vcs-Git (but not
Vcs-Browser). One usecase is tot have a separate branch for each
Debian series.

Because you can then use
git clone https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/atk.git -B debian/jessie

It looks like hg works the same way.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.5.124

Hi,

> lintian: vcs-field-has-unexpected-spaces has false positives for
> Vcs-Hg that specify a branch

This was fixed in 2.5.124 but I closed #920355 by mistake. Sorry,
Policy Team!


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

--- End Message ---
Reply to: