Re: Security support for adns in squeeze-lts

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Moritz Mühlenhoff writes ("Re: Security support for adns in squeeze-lts"):
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:04:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm upstream for adns and I am keen to support it.  I'm not aware of
> > any security problems with it.
> 
> It's not in the "support ended", but rather in the "limited support"
> category:
> 
> "adns       Stub resolver that should only be used with trusted recursors"

I'm not sure exactly what this means.  Is that string a description of
what way the support is `limited' ?

That sentence describes adns's design goal.  So if that's the only
problem the situation in lts is no worse than stable.

Thanks,
Ian.