On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:21:36 +0100, Michael Hanke wrote: > Hi, Hello Michael, no need to CC me :) > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:07:27PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > Time, CPU cycles and heating permitting, I will try to recompile everything > > and make those 17 packages. > > Please _don't_. > > All those libs are similar to plugins and there to be linked against the > compiled sequences created with odin -- that happens when users use > ODIN. I cannot say for sure, but I'd suspect that they have no other > use, Better being sure, I will ask upstream :) > hence should go into the 'odin' package itself. NAK. Instead, I will do a separate libodin1 package, which odin will depend upon, and put those libraries in a private subdirectory of /usr/lib/. > Additionally, I'd say that everything you have listed under doc/ is a > little more than that. I consider it more of a library of snippets to > play with when developing sequences. I'd put it under /usr/share/odin in > the sense of data files. Still documentation though, they're examples (--> /usr/share/doc/libodin-dev/examples/, probably) > Without looking again, I see nothing that would demand even two binary > packages -- just 'odin' itself. NAK again. It's just crazy, in terms of package management, having the shared libraries and the binaries all in one package :) I will make these packages (as Andreas suggested, mail arrived while I was writing this): libodin1, libodin-dev, libodin1-dbg, odin, odin-doc Obviously, after receiving a reply from upstream. ;) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature