Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.2-000
I'll take a look at this Thorsten, and respond by the end of the week.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
On 09/30/2014 04:43 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Bhaskar,
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
>
>> GT.M does not require OpenSSL, does not statically link to it, and does
>> not in a strict sense, depend on OpenSSL. But there is a looser
>> relationship / dependency.
>
> hmm, while looking at the Debian package, I found the following comment:
> "The upstream V6.2-000 CMakeLists.txt file built only one of three
> possible encryption plugin libraries. This meant that the debian fis-gtm
> package was missing a core piece of the distributed binaries. Upstream
> will
> apply this change to the next release after internal review."
>
> Further the Debian package contains:
> libgtmcrypt_openssl_BLOWFISHCFB.so
> libgtmcrypt_gcrypt_AES256CFB.so
> libgtmcrypt_openssl_AES256CFB.so
>
> So at least the version in the Debian package is actually linked with
> OpenSSL.
>
> As the OpenSSL license contains (advertising) restrictions[1] that are
> not allowed by the AGPL, the AGPL must be extended by an exception clause.
>
> Thorsten
>
> [1]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL%23Licensing&k=%2FbkpAUdJWZuiTILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=G5N3MCzgmIzHOZjVHAPkWPrIpVi%2BYUaznSzJrMCLquI%3D%0A&m=3KyT1ayTnNzWVGGXsiwKtyOsgNa%2FrEJIeNwnErx%2Fb60%3D%0A&s=3aeda9621ba072bc7721b930329d7738cd29ce1249255183cce96cde2d1b2d6f
>
>
>
--
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Reply to: