Hi Emmanuel,Sorry, it seems your questions have remained unanswered for quite some time. Vacations, summer, ...!
Le 28/07/2023 à 13:27, Emmanuel Promayon a écrit :
Dear all,CamiTK 5.1.0 was released upstream and I have updated the package on salsa accordingly. It is now fully compatible with VTK9 and should hopefully be able to migrate back to testing flawlessly!I found out that VTK9 includes java by default (and it does not seem possible to avoid it, although it is not required by all VTK modules). I suppose that breaking vtk into more packages (or just have a vtk9-java package) requires a lot of work, but that would be nice!The inclusion of Java by default (even if not used/required by camitk at all) generated a problem during the autopkgtest process. It seems that the java libs are not included in the default system linker path. I had to add the Java lib path to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH at the beginning of the two autopkgtest scripts (test/config-test.sh and cepgenerator-test.sh):export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${JAVA_HOME}/lib/:${JAVA_HOME}/lib/server/(btw, thanks to a lot to Pierre Gruet who had already done that in d/r, it was a great inspiration!)Does anyone know if that's the expected behavior, if I missed something somewhere in the camitk dependencies, or in the packaging setup?
You're welcome, I had even forgotten about this!I think traditional Java libraries are not expected to use the shared libs of java, they are there for the executables that come along the JRE/JDK.
But as you say, it can happen that we rely on them.
On my setup, everything seems to be ready for upload, but I did not tag the master branch with the debian/5.1.0 tag, as I am not 100% sure that everything is valid (as always it seems ok on my side, but I might have missed something).
About this: I could not get the upstream source from the upstream/pristine-tar branches of the Salsa repository, and launching "uscan" did not allow me to grasp version 5.1.0. Do you think you could fix this?
I can have a look afterwards.
Can someone please have a look and tag+upload if everything seems correct? Thank you in advance for your feedback and all your help along the way. Best regards, Emmanuel
Best, -- Pierre
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature