On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:40:40PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > On 2024-04-16 03:23, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > s390x is a 64-bit architure, so the time_t64 transition was a pure > > formality there. (The old s390 architecture would have been affected > > but retired several years ago.) > > Oh, right, it really is. > > Just checked on a porterbox, apparently all emboss executables segfault on > s390x since bullseye. I believe this deserves a proper BTS bug now. I suppose you meant "RM" instead of "BTS" here. Thanks for filing a report. OTOH, does anyone actually use s390x for any med team package? If not, can we consider to add this too along with other 32-bit archs to our policy? Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature