Hello, On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:54:06PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > I'm the maintainer of SQLite3 packages. Upstream used to ship the > sources and documentation in one tarball. Now this is changed, source > still ships in a tarball, but docs is separeted to a zip file. What > would be the best, merge both to a .orig.tar.gz or make two source > packages? I plan to remerge upstream, but don't know what upstream > name to use, should it be sqlite3+docs or remain plain sqlite3? Should > I accept the seperation? If there's any chance that they release a new version of only one of the files without the other, then I think it makes sense to split it into two source packages as well. As for the name (in case you remerge), I wouldn't make any change. The previous name described the combination of program with docs, so it should still do that. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature