Bug#765599: RFS: libfm/1.2.3-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfm"
* Package name : libfm
Version : 1.2.3-1
Upstream Author : LXDE team.
* URL : http://lxde.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libfm-data - file management support (common data)
libfm-dbg - file management support (libfm debug)
libfm-dev - file management support (core development files)
libfm-doc - file management support (development documentation)
libfm-extra-dev - file management support (libfm-extra development files)
libfm-extra4 - file management support (extra library)
libfm-gtk-data - file management support (GTK+ library common data)
libfm-gtk-dbg - file management support (libfm-gtk debug)
libfm-gtk-dev - file management support (GTK+ GUI development files)
libfm-gtk4 - file management support (GTK+ 2.0 GUI library)
libfm-modules - file management support (loadable modules for library)
libfm-modules-dbg - file management support (libfm-modules debug)
libfm-tools - file management support (utilities)
libfm4 - file management support (core library)
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/libfm
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libf/libfm/libfm_1.2.3-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6.
* Making package friendly to porters (using stage1 build profile).
- Added package libfm-extra-dev.
- debian/rules: added switches for stage1.
- debian/control: added comments for porters and commented-out tags
Build-Profiles: <!stage1> into some stanzas.
* Merging upstream version 1.2.3.
* Removing hack against symlink /usr/include/libfm, issue was fixed by
upstream.
* debian/copyright: update copyright data.
* Adding lintian-overrides files with required comments.
* Setting NEWS file as ustream changelog (satisfy lintian notice).
Regards,
Andriy Grytsenko
Reply to: