Hi, >Thank you for taking the time to review my packaging :) I did already review the ublock package, this one was somewhat a similar package ;) >What positive feedback did you get? I didn't see any other comments on >the bug report nor the pkg-mozext-maintainers list. it was a private mail answering my join request >I thought that the whole point of overriding was to indicate that >Lintian was wrong about the tag. If that's not the case, what is the >point of overriding? you and Jakub are *completely* right. With your permission I can upload a new release on new. debdiff attached +ublock-origin (1.5.6+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Readd lintian override, wrongly removed + + -- Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:56:49 +0100 (and the removed file) build ongoing here http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-2/buildlog thanks and sorry for the bad change :( Gianfranco
Attachment:
debdiff
Description: Binary data