[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit



Hi Balint and all,

On 16/05/2016 16:50, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Giulio,
> 
> 2016-05-08 14:32 GMT+02:00 Giulio Paci <giuliopaci@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Balint and all,
>>
>> Il 08/mag/2016 14:15, "Bálint Réczey" <balint@balintreczey.hu> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Control: owner -1 balint@balintreczey.hu
>>>
>>> 2016-05-06 23:44 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Costamagna
>>> <locutusofborg@debian.org>:
>>>> Hi Balint, so I presume you want to set yourself as owner of this bug,
>>>> right?
>>>
>>> Sure, and I'm also about to upload the package in the current state.
>>> Feel free to continue the discussion about bringing irstlm under Debian
>>> Science
>>> in this bug or or on the team's mailing list.
>>
>> I currently do not need this version (I am using the old one in production,
>> so I think we can wait a few days before uploading this package and upload
>> it under Debian science).
>>
>> If I understand correctly, given its current state, the only things that I
>> need to do are:
>> 1) ensure that I am part of Debian Science team;
>> 2) change maintainer and uploaders;
>> 3) move git repository under Debian Science and update Vcs fields in the
>> package;
>> 4) update changelog.
>>
>> Is that all?
> 
> I think so.
> 
>>
>> In order to move the repository, is it fine if I setup a new repository in
>> Debian Science, change my remote url and push there? Or will I cause
>> troubles  acting in this way (eg.: too many commits emails)?
>> Do you have a better migration workflow?
> 
> I think pushing is OK.

As you probably noticed I moved the package under Debian Science and Mattia already uploaded the new version. :-)

> Since I have uploaded the package and FTP Masters already accepted it
> I close this bug.
> 
> Regarding the package, providing a symbols file would be nice. :-)

Given my previous attempt at providing symbols files for C++ packages I am reluctant to do so.
If possible I will avoid adding that file for a while:
upstream is not answering my emails since a while and I still have to instruct them about SONAMEs and many other things (e.g., binary name conflicts, scripts extensions,
...); I would like to have better interaction with them, before trying to keep track of symbols.

> Feel free to ping me on ask for sponsorship on debian-science in the
> future, there is no
> need to file formal RFS-s to BTS if there are people who regularly
> sponsor upload for you. :-)

Fine, thank you. :-)

Cheers,
Giulio


Reply to: