[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#848133: marked as done (RFS: rdup/1.1.15-0.1)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:23:31 -0700
with message-id <20170110032331.mfn5z5tpwys6a6fc@hephaestus.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#848133: RFS: rdup/1.1.15-1.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #848133,
regarding RFS: rdup/1.1.15-0.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
848133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of "rdup". I contacted the maintainer
(jsogo@debian.org) two weeks ago about this NMU, but he did not answered me.

  rdup - utility to create a file list suitable for making backups

Package: rdup
Version: 1.1.15-1.0
Upstream Author: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
Homepage: https://github.com/miekg/rdup
License: GPL-3
Section: utils


Download with dget:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rdup/rdup_1.1.15-1.0.dsc

Or build it with gbp:

    gbp clone --pristine-tar https://git.gueux.org/rdup.git
    cd rdup
    gbp buildpackage

Thanks.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
control: tag -1 +wontfix

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 06:25:53PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> NMUs are to fix bugs. Most of your entries would be in scope if there
> would have been a bug filed (eg by you).. But without bugs filed and
> without a nmudiff sent to BTS it is hard to justify an NMU.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 11:18:36PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> I think I won't have time to work on this soon, so my changes won't be for
> stretch anyway.

Closing this RFS in light of the above messages.

Thank you to all involved for the efforts to revitalise this package!

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: