[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#882840: marked as done (RFS: jpeces/4.2.1-1 [ITP])



Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:30:24 +0200
with message-id <20180411173024.28808a40@debian.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: jpeces/4.2.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #882840,
regarding RFS: jpeces/4.2.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882840: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882840
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jpeces"

 * Package name    : jpeces
   Version         : 4.2.1-1
   Upstream Author : Innocent De Marchi <tangram.peces@gmail.com>
 * URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pecesjocdetangr/
 * License         : GPL-2+
   Section         : games

  It builds those binary packages:

    jpeces     - Xinese Tangram puzzle and others

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
  following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/jpeces


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
  command:

    dget -x
    https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jpeces/jpeces_4.2.1-1.dsc

  

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release (Closes: #882771).


  Regards,
   Innocent De Marchi

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, 

There are several aspects of this package that need improvement: I
withdraw this RFS while I proceed to make the necessary improvements.

Thanks!

I. De Marchi

--- End Message ---

Reply to: