El 14/1/20 a les 9:55, Andrey Rahmatullin ha escrit: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:25:17AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> I'm working with a package (octomap) that is composed by two libraries >> depending on another one built in the same package. >> >> The question is that to build that two libraries correctly firstly the library >> that they depend must be build and _installed_. It's the _only_ way that I have >> found without patched all upstream. > Make two source packages or patch it so that it can use the library > without installing it. > >> Please, someone can tell me how can I put in a d/rules a "make install" to /usr >> that works? > The package build process should NEVER do such things. > well, I don't agree with you position. However I have to admit that I'm just a simple DM and not a DD, so my position could be weak. But, it's difficult to me understand why I should make a complicate process decoupling a package, patched and so on if just with one make install should be enough. Reading dpkg documentation and policy 4.9.2 [1] I understand that this step is allowed and can be done. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't understand how to do it because I have not seen any real package with this activated. Best regards, Leopold [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-rules-requires-root -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature