Hi, On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 07:18:23PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> wrote:What happened to format_security.diff? Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase.Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to record it here.That is not the way you should do things: Just dropping a patch when it does not apply cleanly is not an option. You have to look at the patch, understand it and check if the codebase has changed so that it is not needed anymore FUNCTIONALLY. That is not the case for any of the dropped patches as far as I can see, so please rebase them. You can use gbp pq or quilt for that.I have had a look at your latest mentors upload and imported the changes that are useful into git.
I messed up the FRS bug. Because I filed another bug leave this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012483
But it was closed by bartm@debian.org. Now the rush package on mentors is latest. Could you have a look? To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rush/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rush/rush_2.2+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: rush (2.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (Closes: #1001091) * Fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160) * Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1 * drop debian/patches/intprops.patch * drop debian/patches/format_security.diff * refactor manpages patch * add debhelper-compat (= 13) * add Vcs-* in d/control * add build-depens: texinfo * Remove build-deps dh-autoreconf * Add myself as maintainer (Closes: #1012205) * tiny d/watch file Thank you, Bo -- Best Regards,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature