Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but never built

[Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>]

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:33 AM Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 8:50 AM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > [cc me please]
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I am staring at the autopkgtest results for jpeg-xl:
> > >
> > > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jpeg-xl
> > >
> > > It seems CI consider there is a regression for s390x:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > Reading state information...
> > > E: Unable to locate package libjxl-tools
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > * https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/j/jpeg-xl/26649194/log.gz
> > >
> > > Is there a way to de-activate explicitly s390x from the default
> > > autpkgtest list ?
> >
> > I'll try a
> >
> > Architecture: !s390x
>
> The "!" syntax is not supported in Architecture:, you'd
> have to spell out all archs in d/control..

I stole the syntax from:

https://salsa.debian.org/toolchain-team/gcc/-/commit/1d32ce5e1a28d741e2bc97e5db7d0df5f330e058

> There was a recent discussion on -devel, and one suggestion [1]
> was to do something like:
>
>  Build-Depends: package-is-broken-on-ppc64el [ppc64el],...
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00293.html

oh, well. I'll try yet-another-cross-finger upload then

thanks !