On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:09:26AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 29.02.24 00:42, Lyndon Brown wrote: > > Hello, > > > b) Re-upload 2.10.08+ds-1 with a version number like '2.11.01+ds-3- > > really2.10.08+ds-1', such that it will count as a higher version number > > than the mistaken upload of 2.11.01+ds-3 and thus replace it in package > > upgrades. You'd then continue with this pattern for 2.10.x updates > > until the eventual proper migration of 2.11 to unstable, at which point > > you can simplify the version numbering back to '2'11.x'. > > > > I'm sure you'll agree that option B would probably be preferable. > > > > Yes, agreed. Currently I'm trying to find out how to reflect that downgrade > in my gbp style git repository. > > I try to build my source package by calling "gbp buildpackage > --git-upstream-tree=upstream_2.10.08+ds", where "upstream_2.10.08+ds" is a > new upstream branch containing the source code for version 2.10.08. It tries > to build the binary package, which fails b/c the BD's are not fulfilled. > However I just need the source package. How I can prevent from running > "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui -i -I", I just need "dpkg-buildpackage <snip> > -S". Have you just tried passing through -S from gbp? As in "gbp buildpackage -S"? It might not work if you have set a different builder like schroot, but you can just pass --git-builder=debuild or similar in that case. > > Hilmar > -- > Testmail > -- Loren M. Lang lorenl@north-winds.org http://www.north-winds.org/ Public Key: http://www.north-winds.org/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: 7896 E099 9FC7 9F6C E0ED E103 222D F356 A57A 98FA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature