Aw: Re: How to name a similiar package?
> Are the new tools replacements or additional?
Additional
> then ssh-tools-extra would make sense
That's actually a good suggestion. Thank you
> I don't see why adding a 3rd language
> to the 2 already used makes things 'hard to package'
The scripts are written with minimal dependency
and tested with different OSes.
So they are easy to package.
Adding the Go ones I have some difficulties myself already:
- 3rd party dependencies (which are packaged already luckily)
- I am not yet familiar with packaging Go programs (just managed to create one yesterday)
- I am not sure if that mixed package should then go to the [1] Go Packaging Team,
and when, if they are OK with that mix of languages:
So, yeah maybe after I have worked out these things,
it is not that difficult anymore
and actually I would also prefer to keep all in one upstream repo.
I also don't want to make it any harder to package for [2]others
[1] https://go-team.pages.debian.net
[2] https://repology.org/project/ssh-tools/versions
Reply to: