Re: [FWD] Re: [Jackit-devel] parallel installs to die
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Hi,
>>I've doubled checked the new packages, both on amd64 and i386, and I
>>confirm that the work fine, without breaking other packages (this
>>0.102.20 upstream release was also included in the recent 1.0 64
>>Studio release, and no bug reports have come so far).
>>
>>So if everybody is fine with it I'm going to upload the new package
>>within this week.
JU> Can you wait until etch release please ? This will mean binaries
JU> compiled on sid will have a different SONAME requirements, so will no
JU> longer work on etch. Right ?
No they will still work, as the SONAME is unchanged with respect to
the jack version in etch, it's still 0.0.23.
>>I'm also thinking to file bug reports against those packages that
>>build depend on libjack0.100.0-dev, and which should from now on use
>>simply libjack-dev, although a dummy libjack0.100.0-dev package
>>depending on libjack-dev is still provide to avoid FTBFSs.
JU> This is pretty disruptive, and does not contribute to general activity
JU> of etch release.
Why that? The libjack-dev package is currently a virtual package
(which at the moment is only provided by libjack0.100.0-dev) , and in
any case a package should better depend on it rather that on
libjack0.100.0-dev, unless there are specific reasons to do it.
So I think that bug report should be done in any case, to prevent
having to change build-dependencies if libjack0.100.0-dev gets
updated, say to libjack0.102.20-dev.
Ciao,
Free
Reply to: