Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:38:46 +0200 with message-id <20200828223846.GB165715@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#969187: librtmidi-dev: content differs vastly between architectures has caused the Debian Bug report #969187, regarding librtmidi-dev: content differs vastly between architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 969187: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969187 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: librtmidi-dev: content differs vastly between architectures
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 22:53:57 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 159864803786.14335.720697451292902781.reportbug@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de>
Package: librtmidi-dev Version: 3.0.0~ds1-2+b1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: tg@mirbsd.de The amd64 package… https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/librtmidi-dev/filelist /usr/include/rtmidi/RtMidi.h /usr/include/rtmidi/rtmidi_c.h /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librtmidi.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/rtmidi.pc /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/README.md /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.Debian.amd64.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/copyright … and the arm64 package… https://packages.debian.org/sid/arm64/librtmidi-dev/filelist /usr/include/RtMidi.h /usr/include/rtmidi/RtMidi.h /usr/include/rtmidi/rtmidi_c.h /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/librtmidi.so /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/librtmidi.so /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/rtmidi.pc /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/rtmidi.pc /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/README.md /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.Debian.arm64.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/copyright /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/copyright /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/readme /usr/share/doc/librtmidi-dev/release.txt.gz … differ *vastly* in content. Something in the build system must be wrong. This can lead to architecture-specific FTBFSes in pak‐ kages depending on librtmidi-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages librtmidi-dev depends on: pn libasound2-dev <none> pn libjack-dev <none> pn librtaudio-dev <none> pn librtmidi3 <none> ii librtmidi4 3.0.0~ds1-2+b1 pn librtmidi5 <none> librtmidi-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages librtmidi-dev suggests: pn librtmidi-doc <none>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>, 969187-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#969187: librtmidi-dev: content differs vastly between architectures
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 00:38:46 +0200
- Message-id: <20200828223846.GB165715@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.2008282213110.18684@herc.mirbsd.org>
- References: <[🔎] 159864803786.14335.720697451292902781.reportbug@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de> <[🔎] 20200828213243.GA165715@ramacher.at> <[🔎] 159864803786.14335.720697451292902781.reportbug@tglase-nb.lan.tarent.de> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.2008282213110.18684@herc.mirbsd.org>
On 2020-08-28 22:14:49 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Sebastian Ramacher dixit: > > >That looks like the expected difference between the amd64 and arm64 > >packages. So what issues are you seeing? > > Oh, interesting. I was using p.d.o to search for RtMidi.h > and found this divergence in the file lists on p.d.o… > > >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/librtmidi-dev/filelist > >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/arm64/librtmidi-dev/filelist > > I admit I didn’t download the packages and look for myself, > trusting the p.d.o data to be, if possibly up to 36 hours out > of date, at least accurate. So nothing to fix here Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---