Re: guitarix-0.46.0 released

[Hermann Meyer <brummer-@web.de>]

Hi Nicholas

Thanks for your reply.

Well, my massage was just a notice.

Simply because there wasn't any release of guitarix within the last two
years.

But now I've added some new features and make a new release and switch
from Sourceforge to Github, so I guessed I should message about it here.

I've seen that Dennis Braun have update the VCS version already but
there seems to be some blocking transitions ongoing or some test fail, I
don't know.

As a long time debian user I happily work together with the debian
developers when it comes to issues with some of my upstream projects.

regards

hermann

Am 15.03.24 um 21:22 schrieb Nicholas D Steeves:
> Dear Hermann,
>
> Thank you for this notice; you're right to be concerned; reply follows
> inline:
>
> Hermann Meyer <brummer-@web.de> writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Guitarix v0.46.0 is released
> >
> > https://github.com/brummer10/guitarix/releases/tag/V0.46.0
> >
> > You may consider updating the guitarix debian package to reflect the
> > latest development.
> >
> > Latest release in debian is now nearly two years old.
> >
> > Note, that the guitarix-ladspa packages don't be supported any more and
> > should be removed. Instead of that there is now a new project providing
> > guitarix.vst3 which should be a new package.
> >
> > https://github.com/brummer10/guitarix.vst/releases/tag/v0.3
> >
> > regards
> >
> > hermann
> If you have time, would you please consider filing a bug against
> guitarix with the above information?
>
>    https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
>
> Using "reportbug" is recommended, but not required.  I'd also recommend
> CCing your bug to the uploaders listed on this page:
>
>    https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/guitarix
>
> In addition to creating a ticket that won't be lost, filing a bug puts
> into motion a couple important QA processes, and those processes exist
> to rectify cases where a package appears to be defacto
> abandoned/unmaintained.
>
> Kind regards,
> Nicholas